This study by one of the founding fathers of scoiology, The Pretestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, by Max WeberMax Weber, is clearly written in opposition to Karl Marx (even thought Weber does not do Marx the honor of refering to him) and the Marxist concept of dialectical materialism, with its insistence that social change takes place through the conflict of opposites. Instead, Weber relates the rise of a capitalist economy to the Puritan determination to work out anxiety over salvation or damnation by performing good deeds — an effort that ultimately encouraged capitalism.

Weber discovered that in Germany, Protestants tended to be wealthier and better educated than Catholics because Protestants showed a special tendency to develop “economic rationalism”; that is, a particular approach to creating wealth that was less focused on the gain of comfort than on the pursuit of profit itself. The general outlook on life and work that the early protestants sects drew from their belief made them singularly well adapted to modern capitalism, according to Weber.

{ 1 comment }

David Ricardo (1772 – 1823)The Principles of Trade and Taxation, by David Ricardo was an English political economist. He wrote his principles as a reaction to Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, and after having been encouraged by James Mill and his son John. At several points he was fairly critical of Adam Smith.

Ricardo has often been credited with systematizing economics, and surely has been one of the most influential of the classical economists, along with Thomas Malthus and Adam Smith. His writings also influenced Karl Marx.

Ricardo was also a member of Parliament, businessman, financier and speculator, who amassed a considerable personal fortune.

Ricardo is perhaps most remembered for his contribution to the theory of comparative advantage. This theory, which he partly borrowed (from Robert Torrens), provides a fundamental argument in favor of free trade between countries and of specialization among individuals. Ricardo showed that, under a given set of assumptions, there is mutual benefit from exchange even if one party is more productive in every possible area than its trading counterpart as long as each concentrates on the activities where it has a relative productivity advantage. This important conclusion is also often referred to in discussion of international trade.

{ 1 comment }